Based on this text I may evidence that the animals
are acting just as wicked as humans who fight and kill for power, and that
greed is stronger than moral. Animals in this text are imperialist, humans can
be nice too. But goodness cannot exist without evil.
"It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating. "
-Oscar Wilde, The model millionaire
"It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating. "
-Oscar Wilde, The model millionaire
This text called Rikki-Tikki-Tavi written by Rudyard
Kipling is about a mongoose, a brave mongoose, which fights against big and
dangerous snakes without fear.
The author of the text shows us the wicked and evil pat of the idiom “survival of the fittest” but in a more human way.
The author of the text shows us the wicked and evil pat of the idiom “survival of the fittest” but in a more human way.
The snake and
his wife wanted to kill the humans who lived there because they did want to be
the only owners of the place and make it their own kingdom, in which they were
the only king and queen, Except of their kids, they were mad because their land
was occupied by strangers, the land they seized.
The seized that
land because was a place in which they can have a comfortable life, in which they
can take care of their babies while they grow up, making sure they are safe and
sound, then give them the land so they can keep the bequeathed.
A small but
brave mongoose played the hero in this text. Is bewitching that a small
mongoose scared the big, dangerous and selfish snakes, He wasn’t afraid of
them, he actually was really pissed off by them and for him and his family that
was unforgivable.
This brave
mongoose proved his bravery fighting against the snakes for the humans; he will
take a shot just to defend the innocent, he represents the goodness of humans.
In the other hand, the snakes represent the wicked part of life. The mongoose
couldn’t be good if there isn’t evil to fight with: And the snakes couldn’t be
evil if there aren’t good animals to compare them with.